Also, during Act One, Juror #9 is the first to master thesis writing specialists openly recognize Juror #10s racist attitude, stating that, What this man says is very dangerous. He is not interested in the needs of a person and is therefore unsuccessful with his leadership style. In the end he is the last of the jurors to plead guilty. His new behavior shows that he is realizing that his position within the group has changed. How will one person convince eleven other jurors of reasonable doubt and change their votes from guilty to not guilty? He encouraged others to discuss their doubt on the case and he was ready to receive feedback. The final reason why he failed is because he had no clear vision.
12, angry, men, essay
Easy ways to make an essay interestin, Iraq war essay conclusion, The search for marvin gardens essay, Gilman scholarship essays,
When asked about his reasons for pleading guilty, he states that the facts are clear and cannot be questioned. First of all: People are the key. The first instance of this is after the first vote where he alone votes for a not guilty verdict. The last point to be mentioned here is that he tries how scholarships help students essay to dictate the procedure and the methods of the discussion in an autocratic way. He aims for group success. We will show inwhich leadership style juror #3 can be categorized and what mistakes have been done. There were jurors that also showed responsibility.