now a key source for advocates seeking to apply human rights standards. For a nation that pays the highest rates of healthcare in the world per person, it does not ensure a fair, equitable process that measures that outcome of those who are insured. A tiger chasing him through the grass is immune to Crusoes right-claim. Its difficult to imagine how. On the other hand, healthcare is something that is given to you; it costs money and is a basic need of life. But thats ridiculous, and no one is claiming that. Environmental protection works best when citizens rights to have access to information, to participate in decision making and to press claims for redress when rules arent followed have real meaning in the corridors of environmental policy, project planning and economic decision-making. Its only about whether it makes sense to call health care a right.
Equity: Resources and services must be distributed and accessed according to people's needs. When has the positive duty been fulfilled? This statement has logic and respects the freedom of an individuals earnings and what he or she proceeds to do with them, however it is a little extreme. While this might be required when resources are limited, it only underscores the fundamental difference between positive and negative rights. But in a globalized world economy, with chains of production that snake across national borders, harmful activities too often hide in the unregulated space between national laws and global agreements, beyond the reach of either. Critics of the positive-negative distinction sometimes inappropriately conflate the cost of producing goods and services to satisfy positive-rights claims with the cost of police, courts, and prisons to punish infringements on negative rights, but thats a category error. No right worth fighting for has ever been simple or else there would be no significance. Practically speaking, those questions are resolved by politics, an essay on why i should and thus are subject to political winds. That, however, is not a right to health care. Whereas negative rights can exist together simultaneously, positive rights form an uneasy and inconsistent tableau of mutually unsatisfiable claims.
In a country like ours, it is a shame that we do not provide something that should be a basic human right to every citizen. Yes, health care is a basic human right. Humans are affordable unalienable rights that include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.